Henrik Akesson wrote: > From where I come from, it's a no-no to keep unused code "just in > case". Normally, this kind of code tends to accumulate and never be > cleaned out. On top of that, the "just in case" code tends to have to > be rewritten when finally needed, as it is seldom fit for the purpose > (the imagined case is often not the real case). Your arguments make sense and I have changed my mind - Martin _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
