On 04/11/03, Daniel Rogers wrote: > Calvin Williamson wrote: > >So this is a list of old classes in gegl/gegl: > > > >Buffer > >Storage > >ComponentStorage > >ColorModel > >ColorSpace > >Tile > >Image > >ImageIterator > > > >that will be replaced by the new gegl/gegl/image classes once > >they exist. > > > >Roughly correct? > > roughly yes. Let me know if you start working on something specific. I > have at least a header file for several classes I have not started on yet. I havent yet, but email your headers to the list if you can. > The "detail work" that I am not working on at all are more Buffer data > types and more SampleModels. Also, I think I was fairly complete on all > the property stuff, but it would be cool if someone else went over the > classes I have in cvs and give me some opinions about how the property > stuff should work. Ill look it over too then. > In particular, I am not sure if the SampleModel normalizers stuff was > really handled very well. Okay. Im also a bit short on time at the moment, thought I would have more but... hopefully soon. > ok. great. I really just got all that out because I knew I wouldn't have > any computer time for the next week. And I was right. I didn't even get a > chance to get to this message until today. Also, I wanted to minimize the > damage the fire might have caused. > There's not that much that's flammable around here. Dont worry. Except remove the C++ comments sometime if you can. Calvin
