Re: [Gegl-developer] partial implementation of the change to gegl_scanline_processor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Calvin Williamson wrote:
I think this looks more or less like the right idea. If you want to finish off changing all the scanline functions to just take the data lists, you could have a go at that, and
then we can commit after that happens. If not, I might
be able to do it in a few days...


Yeah, I was starting to head in that direction.

I have run into a bit of a problem though.  Validate inputs doesn't
produce a GList of data_inputs that includes all the non-image inputs
(for example, in GeglColor, there is a pixel, width, and height input
that isn't registered as data_inputs.  I do see that these options are
supposed to be stored in an image op itself.  I thought that a goal of
your design was to allow this stuff to be registered as an input from
another node?  If so, they shouldn't be stored in the op itself should they?

--
Dan



[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux