Re: [Gegl-developer] an assumption of data_inputs and data_outputs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Gegl-developer] an assumption of data_inputs and data_outputs
From: Calvin Williamson <calvinw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:39:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <3E5EE900.8010509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:43:44PM -0800
Reply-to: Calvin Williamson <calvinw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:43:44PM -0800, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> Is it safe to assume that all inputs and outputs in 
> scanline_processor_process will have the same width?

Since scanline processor is working on point ops,
I think so. 

Calvin

References:
- [Gegl-developer] an assumption of data_inputs and data_outputs
  - From: Daniel Rogers

Prev by Date: Re: [Gegl-developer] questions about the rect in ImageIterator and ImageData
Next by Date: Re: [Gegl-developer] questions about the rect in ImageIterator and ImageData
Previous by thread: [Gegl-developer] an assumption of data_inputs and data_outputs
Next by thread: [Gegl-developer] blend ops
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [gtk] [GIMP Users] [KDE] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art]

Powered by Linux