Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2024-07-29 11:15:42 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote: >> I don't think you can "create" new ones arbitrarily, but if another >> one already exists, you could use that. For instance _BitInt(64) >> with a recent enough gcc. > > OK, I suppose that I could use _BitInt(65), _BitInt(66) for the > other types as they seem to be supported (at least on my platform). > This is not absolutely guaranteed to work, but at least compilation > errors due to incompatible types should be meaningful. It is also quite easy to create duplicate types that way. Perhaps single-member structs will work for your use-case (but, yeah, lots of boxing and unboxing). -- Arsen Arsenović
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
