On 2024-07-29 11:15:42 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote: > I don't think you can "create" new ones arbitrarily, but if another > one already exists, you could use that. For instance _BitInt(64) > with a recent enough gcc. OK, I suppose that I could use _BitInt(65), _BitInt(66) for the other types as they seem to be supported (at least on my platform). This is not absolutely guaranteed to work, but at least compilation errors due to incompatible types should be meaningful. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
