Re: g++ with VLA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: g++ with VLA
From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:46:14 -0400
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAF1jjLtCqgNUfeFjJB+QTykWu_i3-9D=OToxX6WMkHugTcX-4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF1jjLspQ39Xu0tpKsFkxyFvgv72aqeUjZ8gVh5WBNaAPVnORw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdTtjRM6iT0yzyZd5-aazGjh=s7+7z93wmiD79e-M1k3fA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF1jjLtCqgNUfeFjJB+QTykWu_i3-9D=OToxX6WMkHugTcX-4g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 2:39 PM NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like clang added support for this in v12.  Maybe it would be
> a good candidate to add support?  I guess I can file the PR and see
> where it lands.

Just to close the loop for the mailing list archive:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114534

References:
- g++ with VLA
  - From: NightStrike via Gcc-help
- Re: g++ with VLA
  - From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help
- Re: g++ with VLA
  - From: NightStrike via Gcc-help

Prev by Date: Re: g++ with VLA
Next by Date: Bug in GCC's resolution of C++20 reversed operator== functions?
Previous by thread: Re: g++ with VLA
Next by thread: Bug in GCC's resolution of C++20 reversed operator== functions?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux