Re: arm-none-eabi, nested function trampolines and caching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/11/2023 10:51, Ed Robbins via Gcc-help wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 07:21, Matthias Pfaller <leo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2023-11-27 16:16, Ed Robbins via Gcc-help wrote:
Hello,
I am using gcc-arm-none-eabi with a cortex M7 device, with caches
(data/instruction) enabled. Nested function calls result in a usage fault
because there is no clear cache call for this platform.


I have lots of code with nested functions. When switching to gcc-12 I got random
crashes on my cortex-m7 targets. In order to get that working again I had to patch
gcc/config/arm/arm.h:



Can I ask (either or both of you) why you are using are using nested functions like this? This is possibly the first time I have heard of anyone using them, certainly the first time in embedded development. Even when I programmed in Pascal, where nested functions are part of the language, I did not use them more than a couple of times.

What benefit do you see in nested functions in C, compared to having separate functions? Have you considered moving to C++ and using lambdas, which are more flexible, standard, and can be very much more efficient?

This is, of course, straying from the topicality of this mailing list. But I am curious, and I doubt if I am the only one who is.

David




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux