Re: Use-case for _addcarryx_u64() wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 01:37:53PM +0200, Mason wrote:
> On 01/06/2023 09:42, Mason wrote:
> 
> > As far as I can tell, intrinsics _addcarry_u64() and _addcarryx_u64() are
> > plain wrappers around the same __builtin_ia32_addcarryx_u64() function.
> > 
> > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/i386/adxintrin.h
> 
> Hello Uros, Jakub,
> 
> I want to report a missed-optimization bug with _addcarry_u64().
> (I can file an issue on Bugzilla, if you deem it appropriate.)

Filing this in bugzilla is the right way to go.
I think we'll need to do something about this stuff urgently on
most of the arches anyway, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989#c56
But what your testcase shows is a separate issue, so should be
filed separately.
Thanks.

	Jakub




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux