Re: Compiling modules: understanding filename conventions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 06:09, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think, I have some misconceptions about compiling modules :-(
>
> Say, I have a module interface unit modA.hxx and a module implementation
> unit modA.cxx for module A. If I compile modA.hxx I get the bmi in
> gcm.cache and a file modA.o. I need the bmi to compile the modA.cxx, but
> this overrides modA.o. This does not harm, since modA.o from modA.hxx
> looks more or less empty. Linking with the (overridden) file modA.o does
> work.

A module interface unit is not a header, so there's no reason to use a
.hxx extension. So if you name them something like modA_intf.cxx and
modA_impl.cxx then you avoid the problem.

You can also use -fmodule-only to inhibit creation of the .o file (GCC
doesn't know whether you intend to compile a module interface unit or
a module implementation unit, so it treats them the same and assumes
you want a linkable .o file).



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux