Re: Anybody ever got an ARM Thumb-2 cross compiler to work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I believe these releases support the LTO plugin, but the most recent at the moment is 11.x. If you need GCC 12, you'll have to wait a bit :-)

Thanks,

Christophe


On 6/16/22 23:06, Gary Oblock via Gcc-help wrote:
Chistophe,

That would work for me if it's GCC 12 based and built to support the LTO "pluggin."
Would you know if that's the case?

Thanks,

Gary
________________________________
From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon.oss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 12:45 AM
To: Gary Oblock <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>; Gary Oblock via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anybody ever got an ARM Thumb-2 cross compiler to work?

[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection practices.]

Hi Gary,

Sorry, your request is not entirely clear to me either.
IIUC what you want to achieve has been working for decades and is certainly not obsolete :-)

If you don't need to build such a toolchain, you can download pre-built binary toolchains from Arm for instance:
https://developer.arm.com/Tools%20and%20Software/GNU%20Toolchain#Technical-Specifications

If you want to build a cross toolchain, it's not straightforward but very well supported. I think there are already plenty of documentation describing how to do that.

The important thing is to get the right target triplet when configuring your toolchain, you want something like arm-eabi or arm-linux-gnueabi, as opposed to aarch64*.

Once the build has completed, when using the compiler make sure to generate code for an architecture/cpu that actually supports Thumb-2 (via -march=XX/-mcpu=XXX), and use -mthumb, as it's generally not the default.

Christophe


On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:11 AM Gary Oblock via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Jonathan

By off the shelf, I mean not creating a new target description file. Something
which I'm not at all experienced in (optimizations are my thing so I'm an
amateur at creating a cross-compiler.)

I can't seem to figure out what the binutils or the gcc target is for Thumb-2.
If you know, please let me know. I suspect that is an obsolete target
that no longer exists for the latest binutils and GCC 12.

Thanks,

Gary

________________________________
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 11:31 PM
To: Gary Oblock <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Gary Oblock via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Anybody ever got an ARM Thumb-2 cross compiler to work?

[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection practices.]



On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, 00:18 Gary Oblock via Gcc-help, <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
The subject line says it all...

I'm beginning to think off the shelf gcc cross compilers are impossible
to create because of binutils.

Why?

What do you mean by "off the shelf"?

At other companies we for the most part
created custom assemblers, loaders and libraries from scratch
when we built a gcc cross compiler.

Why can't you just build a cross binutils too?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux