On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 18:52, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/11/22 12:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 16:16, Dennis Clarke via Gcc-help > > <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> If anyone wonders why the bootstrap4 then the only answer I have is "why > >> not?" given what I see at : https://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html > > > > Is "because it doesn't work" a good enough answer? > > Ha. Well I would not know that unless I tried. > The results sure look pretty : > > io# > io# ls -ltr --full-time */xgcc > -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 5743712 2022-05-10 17:20:58.783980821 +0000 > stage1-gcc/xgcc > -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 2514244 2022-05-10 22:54:53.878374286 +0000 > stage2-gcc/xgcc > -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 6378164 2022-05-11 02:04:07.126706718 +0000 > prev-gcc/xgcc > -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 6378164 2022-05-11 05:21:43.023573431 +0000 > gcc/xgcc > io# > io# > io# openssl dgst -blake2s256 -r prev-gcc/xgcc gcc/xgcc > 9cd9210dc9b0db574ea005e1cd83cc2013d071060fdb4f239aa09060e5b3db5f > *prev-gcc/xgcc > 9cd9210dc9b0db574ea005e1cd83cc2013d071060fdb4f239aa09060e5b3db5f *gcc/xgcc > io# > > The result from stage3 perfectly matches stage4 and that is a good thing. > > > > > Can you just try "make -j2" instead, without bootstrap4? > > Yep. No idea why a bootstrap fails but sure, I can just do the make and > see what happens. "make" and "make bootstrap" are the same. What I'm suggesting is you don't use "make bootstrap4". I didn't even know bootstrap4 existed, and I doubt anybody tests it. Keep it simple. Don't do fancy things you don't need.
