On 5/11/22 12:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 16:16, Dennis Clarke via Gcc-help
<gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If anyone wonders why the bootstrap4 then the only answer I have is "why
not?" given what I see at : https://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
Is "because it doesn't work" a good enough answer?
Ha. Well I would not know that unless I tried.
The results sure look pretty :
io#
io# ls -ltr --full-time */xgcc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 5743712 2022-05-10 17:20:58.783980821 +0000
stage1-gcc/xgcc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 2514244 2022-05-10 22:54:53.878374286 +0000
stage2-gcc/xgcc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 6378164 2022-05-11 02:04:07.126706718 +0000
prev-gcc/xgcc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 6378164 2022-05-11 05:21:43.023573431 +0000
gcc/xgcc
io#
io#
io# openssl dgst -blake2s256 -r prev-gcc/xgcc gcc/xgcc
9cd9210dc9b0db574ea005e1cd83cc2013d071060fdb4f239aa09060e5b3db5f
*prev-gcc/xgcc
9cd9210dc9b0db574ea005e1cd83cc2013d071060fdb4f239aa09060e5b3db5f *gcc/xgcc
io#
The result from stage3 perfectly matches stage4 and that is a good thing.
Can you just try "make -j2" instead, without bootstrap4?
Yep. No idea why a bootstrap fails but sure, I can just do the make and
see what happens.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional
