On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:33 PM Segher Boessenkool <
segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:06:23PM -0800, Reshabh K Sharma wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:23 AM Segher Boessenkool <
> > segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > You can use TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST?
> >
> > Thank you so much! I think target_sched_adjust_cost will do.
> > Given two rtx_insn,
> > x = exp_load addr offset and
> > y = add addr z,
> > these two instructions are the input arguments to
> target_sched_adjust_cost,
> >
> > how do I check that given rtx_insn is exp_load? (how do we check if
> > rtx_insn is of type exp_load, add or any other target specific
> instruction?)
> > and how do I check if there is a read after read dependency for addr
> > operand and not the offset.
>
> "type" is just an insn attribute, so you would use
> if (get_attr_type (insn) == TYPE_EXP_LOAD)
> or similar.
>
Thank you so much!
Initially I added an instruction in binutils inside opcode/riscv-opc.c as,
"{"flwr", 0, INSN_CLASS_I, "D,s,t", MATCH_FLWR, MASK_FLWR,
match_opcode, INSN_DREF|INSN_4_BYTE }," for a custom instruction, flwr rd,
rs1, rs2
I wanted to add scheduling cost to rd and rs, I was suggested to use
TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST but there I need to check if the instruction is
FLWR and as suggested I tried using get_attr_type. I realized that first I
need to set the type then use get_attr_type. I also couldn't find any other
place to set the attribute other than define_insn but this custom
instruction was just going to be used in inline asm right now so there was
no equivalent rtl from which I can lower into this but since I was not able
to find any other way to set the attribute, I decided to add a pattern
(hoping it to be unmatchable) where I could add the attribute, so inside
riscv.md I added the define_insn for flwr and used set_attr but I'm not
able to find any instruction in the TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST for the
specific type attr.
1. Does inline asm compilation flow goes through the
TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST?
2. Is there a better way to do this? / Am I missing something?
> Segher
>
Many thanks,
Reshabh
