Are there no plans to use C++14 and up for further GCC development? Waiting for your reply. Regards, Abdullah. On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 9:42 PM Abdullah Siddiqui, < siddiquiabdullah92@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Gabriel. > > Thank you for the confirmation. > > Regards, > Abdullah. > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 9:21 PM Gabriel Ravier, <gabravier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2/8/22 01:17, Abdullah Siddiqui via Gcc-help wrote: >> > Jonathan, >> > >> > Thank you for the clarification. >> > >> > Can I still refer to the code in the GitHub repo for the latest source >> code >> > of GCC or is it obsolete? >> >> Although the repository is unofficial, it does appear to be up to date >> with GCC's git repository (although perhaps with a few minutes/hours of >> delay, but that shouldn't be a problem for most purposes). >> >> > Waiting for your reply. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Abdullah. >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 6:35 PM Jonathan Wakely, <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 at 23:04, Abdullah Siddiqui < >> >> siddiquiabdullah92@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello Jonathan. >> >>> >> >>> Thank you for the quick response. >> >>> >> >>> I got 14% from the following GitHub page: >> >>> >> >>> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc >> >>> >> >>> Am I not looking at the correct source for the GCC source code? >> >>> >> >> That's an unofficial mirror that's nothing to do with the GCC project, >> but >> >> it does have a copy of the right sources. Those numbers are wrong >> though. >> >> It counts several .h and .C files as C when they are C++. It's a rough >> >> estimate based on simple heuristics done automatically by GitHub. The >> true >> >> number is higher. >> >> >> >> It also looks like they haven't updated those numbers since April last >> >> year, so it will wrongly count all .c files as C even the ones which >> >> contain C++ instead. A huge number of files were renamed from .c to .cc >> >> recently, because they contain C++ and so had a misleading .c >> extension. >> >> That doesn't seem to be accounted for in those numbers. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
