> Yes. If you write this asm in main() directly it already works, for example. Yes, I was experimenting the difference between writing assembly inside a macro or an inlined function. In this case it could act the same, but when there is some outputs or the "memory" clobber, I think the semantics should be different. > I can do it, if you want. Let me know. I am not very used to this. So, if you do not mind, I will let you do it properly. Thank you, Have a nice day. ________________________________________ From: Segher Boessenkool [segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 3:30 PM To: RECOULES Frederic Cc: amonakov@xxxxxxxxx; gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Interactions between function inlining and inline assembly On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:40:27PM +0000, RECOULES Frederic wrote: > Thank you both for your answers. > > Let me know if I am wrong, but it seems it is more a technical issue > than a conceptual one. So, the compiler could theoretically be patched > to perform this kind of forward address? Yes. If you write this asm in main() directly it already works, for example. > Yet, I would be glad to see such a cool feature, but I do not need it in > reality and it looks like it is a lot of work to obtain it. > > Still, I can file a bug if you want (at the gcc-bugs mailing list, is not it?) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ I can do it, if you want. Let me know. Thanks, Segher
