-fvisibility-inlines-hidden implied by -fvisibility=hidden?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden implied by -fvisibility=hidden?
From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 10:22:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1

If I specify -fvisibility=hidden, does that imply-fvisibility-inlines-hidden? What's the expected gain from adding-fvisibility-inlines-hidden to a project that already has -fvisibility?

Template-heavy code that is not exposed as a shared library itself (butdoes use other shared libraries).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden implied by -fvisibility=hidden?
  - From: Avi Kivity

Prev by Date: Re: Which spec has defined the calling sequence of static C functions (like the extern C functions' has been defined in the Sys V ABI specs)?
Next by Date: Re: Which spec has defined the calling sequence of static C functions (like the extern C functions' has been defined in the Sys V ABI specs)?
Previous by thread: ARM Cortex M0/M0+/M1 - substituting LDR with a MOV rd,#<8 bit immediate> & a logical or arithmetical instruction (LSLS/RORS/ADDS/SUBS/MULS/NEGS/)
Next by thread: Re: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden implied by -fvisibility=hidden?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux