On 2018-11-26 14:32:32 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > As allowed by C99 and later, which was after GCC chose it's > implementation-defined behaviour for those conversions. And raising a > signal here would not be appreciated by all developers. > > Adding a conversion sanitizer seems like a good solution, as it allows > optional checking, when the developer requests it. The > implementation-defined behaviour doesn't need to raise a signal that > way. OK. I've just opened the following https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88479 -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
