Re: Can someone point me to the correct bug report?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Allright, thank you very much!!

Luca


Il giorno sab 13 ott 2018 alle ore 14:07 Jonathan Wakely <
jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:

> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 at 13:01, Luca Bacci <luca.bacci982@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I think I've hit a bug in g++ that has already been resolved
> recently,
> > because it works ok on current g++, but still I encounter it on older
> > supported distributions and in GitLab CI tests.
> >
> > typedef int int_alias;
> >
> > class A
> > {
> > public:
> >     operator int();
> >     operator int_alias() const;
> > };
> >
> > A::operator int() {
> >     return 0;
> > }
> >
> > A::operator int_alias() const {
> >     return 1;
> > }
> >
> >
> > When I copmpile it with older g++ I get the error:
> > error: prototype for ‘A::operator int_alias() const’ does not match any
> in
> > class ‘A’
> > error: candidates are: A::operator int()
> > error:                 A::operator int_alias() const
> >
> > In reality, I am using Gtkmm3. and in my class I have user defined
> > conversion to Gtk::TreeModel::iterator and
> Gtk::TreeModel::const_iterator.
> > In Gtkmm3 Gtk::TreeModel::const_iterator is not a real different type, it
> > is just a typedef to Gtk::TreeModel::iterator. In Gtkmm4 const_iterator
> has
> > become a different type.
> >
> > Can someone point me to the bug report for this? It would be great to add
> > this as reference in the commit message. Thank you very much.
>
> It was fixed by commit https://gcc.gnu.org/r251340 which doesn't
> reference any bug report.
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux