On 2018-08-20 15:52:03 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > And since I can't imagine an implementation where uintmax_t works but > uintptr_t is not defined, I am generalising that to "If uintptr_t is > not defined, the problem isn't really solvable". The problem is that the use of uintptr_t uselessly makes the code more complex. Really, I don't mind whether uintptr_t is defined or not, but the code must compile. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
