Re: libgfortran.so.3 versus libgfortran.so.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 at 16:54, Patrick Begou
<Patrick.Begou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I need an advice,
>
> I've compiled gcc-7.3.0 on my server and started to compile several required
> libs for my applications (OpenMPI, phdf5, petsc, slepc, hypre...)
>
> Running petsc test I get a message as the blas/lapack of the OS (CentOS)  is
> binded with an older libgfortran (the one of the OS):
>
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgfortran.so.3, needed by /lib/../lib64/liblapack.so,
> may conflict with libgfortran.so.4
>
> Is it critical (in short should I compile also lapack and blas with gcc7.3) or
> is compatibility maintained between these 2 libs ?


They're not compatible, that's why they have different SONAMEs.

You'll need to also recompile lapack with the new GCC.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux