U.Mutlu wrote on 07/09/2018 11:48 AM:
陈龙 wrote on 07/09/2018 04:19 AM:
/Sorry ,the site
//https://docs.philips.com/:f:/r/personal/long_chen_philips_com/Documents/g++log?csf=1&e=L28vsv//
have
a wrong direction,please ignore it, refer to
//https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-05/msg00583.html//./
> Is that mean my test is right even if there are so many unexpected
> failures?And could I use the latest gcc version(8.1.0) before I correct
> these fails in my environment?/
Hi,
I had not the time to look further on the failing tests.
I'm just a user like yourself :-)
If you need just a working compiler then take a precompiled stable version
from the repository of your linux distribution. It will be an older version,
not the current 8.1/9 version.
The 8.1/9 version is the "developer version", ie. unfinished work-in-progress
version. This is intented for testers and gcc-developers (patch submitters etc.).
FYI: yesterday an official snapshot of v9 has been released by gccadmin:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-07/msg00119.html
I would say yes, take the latest version, but if your program behaves
differently than expected, then remember that it could be a compiler issue.
Cheers
U.Mutlu
Correction:
GCC 8.1 released [2018-05-02]
GCC 9 has not officially been released yet, IMO, just pre-releases, ie.
snapshots/betas/svn/git.
see also https://gcc.gnu.org/
