Re: Difficulties with section specifications for function definitions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I saw desired software behaviour for a small test program.
> Who would like to help if I stumble on compilation results for this
> use case which I find questionable for an other software module
> at the moment?

I tried to set extra section names for a few functions which are implemented
in a source file like the following from the Linux code base.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c?id=d20787938ddbfd38fa25b3b66068d0f8b5cfc45e#n3

I would like to see that these additional specifications will be also displayed
by a command like “size -A drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.o”
(from the package “binutils 2.29.1-3.1”).
Unfortunately, I observe that the section listing can become incomplete somehow.
It seems that there are more technical dependencies to consider.

I would appreciate your advice. How can the software situation be improved
further here?

Regards,
Markus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux