> In short: you cannot put an attribute after a function declarator in a > function definition. The documentation says in the future that will > be possible, but it has said that for ages, don't hold your breath :-) Thanks for your clarification approach. I would appreciate if the relative ordering of function attributes can become clearer in relation to other specification possibilities before the “declarator” (from the syntax of the C programming language). I saw desired software behaviour for a small test program. Who would like to help if I stumble on compilation results for this use case which I find questionable for an other software module at the moment? Regards, Markus
