Re: Questions on the result of dependency generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the help.

I don't have c/c.h in my computer. Actually, this problem still
existed even I changed my file name.

According to your suggestions, I finally found the cause. It is that
my CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH variable is set to

CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=some_path:

The tail ':' of the variable CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH caused this issue. If
I remove the tail and make it to

CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=some_path

All results are normal (as you said, g++ reports error).

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2017-08-19 02:05 -0700, chran wang wrote:
>> Hello Ruoyao,
>>
>> For (B), I'm sorry that I forgot to say that I changed '#include
>> "c/c.h" ' to '#include "c.h" ' in that case. For others, I did not
>> encounter any errors on my machine as you showed.
>>
>> I'm using ubuntu 16.04. At first, I tried with g++ 5.4.0 since it is
>> shipped with ubuntu. Then I compiled a gcc 7.1 from its source code. I
>> got the same result under g++ 7.1 (and no error output).
>>
> For (A) there should be error output.
>
> Try g++ -E -v c/c.cpp in root.  Then you can see which file "c/c.h" really
> is.
>
> Note that you may have a "c/c.h" in system header directories (-isystem).
> -MM doesn't mention system headers.  By default your include directive can
> not find your root/c/c.h.  So maybe you have "-isystem root" or likewise,
> or maybe "/usr/include/c/c.h" (weird name collision).
>
> Check you environment CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH since it may add system header
> directories unintentionally.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 2017-08-18 15:52 -0700, chran wang wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > I observed some weird results about the dependency generation.
>> > >
>> > > Suppose the source code structure is as follows:
>> > >
>> > > root
>> > >   |-- c
>> > >   |   |-- c.cpp
>> > >   |   |-- c.h
>> > >
>> > > 'c.cpp' includes the header file 'c.h' by
>> > >       #include "c/c.h"
>> > >
>> > > Now I try to generate the dependencies for c/c.cpp.
>> > >
>> > > (A) If I'm now in 'root' folder and run command
>> > >       g++ -MM -MT c/c.o c/c.cpp
>> > > the compiler outputs
>> > >       c/c.o : c/c.cpp    #  which is wrong because it lacks c/c.h
>> >
>> > Your #include directive is bad.  The compiler gives:
>> >
>> > LANG= g++ -MM -MT c/c.o c/c.cpp
>> > c/c.cpp:1:10: fatal error: c/c.h: No such file or directory
>> >  #include "c/c.h"
>> >           ^~~~~~~
>> > compilation terminated.
>> >
>> > > (B) If I'm in folder 'c' and run command
>> > >       g++ -MM -MT c.o c.cpp
>> > > the compiler can ouput the correct results
>> > >       c.o : c.cpp c.h
>> >
>> > Ditto.
>> >
>> > > (C) If I'm in the parent folder of folder 'root' and run command
>> > >       g++ -I./root -MM -MT root/c/c.o root/c/c.cpp
>> > > the results is also correct:
>> > >       root/c/c,o : root/c/c.cpp root/c/c.h
>> >
>> > With -I./root the include directive is correct.
>> >
>> > > (D) Now, if I'm in folder 'root' again and include the head file 'c.h'
>> > > for 'c.cpp' by
>> > >      #include "c.h"  instead of #include "c/c.h"
>> > > the result is also correct.
>> >
>> > Ditto.
>> >
>> > > I'm wondering why (A) cannot give a correct dependency output but (B),
>> > > (C) and (D) can.
>> >
>> > Which version of GCC are you using?  It seems like a preprocessor bug
>> > and I can't reproduce it with GCC 4.6, 4.7, 5.x, 6.x and 7.x.
>> > --
>> > Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
> --
> Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux