On 18/08/17 10:43, niXman wrote: > Andrew Haley 2017-08-18 11:51: >> I've seen many odd things on the GCC lists, but this is one of the >> oddest. Coroutines have been a feature of other programming languages >> for 50 years, and at no point has anyone thought them worthwhile >> enough to put them into C or C++. They could have been added at any >> time; there is nothing particularly difficult about their >> implementation. But somehow now, in 2017, they are of great >> importance. Is there any reason that this language feature is more >> compelling today than at any point in the past? > > no, because we have boost.coroutine2 =) > > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_64_0/libs/coroutine2/doc/html/index.html Yes, we do. But we're being asked to believe that, all of a sudden, language support for coroutines is critical! -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
