Jonathan Wakely wrote:
No, it would be better to just improve the diagnostics using some heuristics.
---
That would be ideal. I was suggesting something that
might be easier to diagnose, but if it can be done
using a heuristic, that would obviously be better.
Simply issuing an error whenever a block isn't closed before a header
would not be conforming, but when the compilation fails anyway the
compiler could check if it happened and say something about it in the
errors.
---
Absolutely. If it is going to generate an error anyway,
the the code is "obviously" non-conforming, so conforming-only
behavior is no longer the point.
