Re: Optimization question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nikolaus Dunn:
> I've run into an issue where turning on compiler optimization using
> -O1 or higher causes an issue in my program. Specifically, I am
> replacing the new and delete operators globally to perform some real
> time allocation tracking. When I compile with -O1 or -O2, my
> implementation of new is not being called by STL classes, via the
> std::allocator. My version of delete IS being called.

That doesn't make much sense, because std::allocator<T> doesn't use
new or delete for objects of type T, so neither should be called.

Instead std::allocator<T> allocates untyped memory (e.g. via malloc)
and then constructs objects into it with placement new-expressions.

What do you replacement new and delete operators look like?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux