On Fr, 2016-09-09 at 10:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 8 September 2016 at 17:11, Sascha Frick wrote: > > > > It seems that the -m64 option, which is necessary for compiling and > > linking makes some problems when the assembler is > > being started. Is there a way to prevent gcc from adding -m64 to > > the > > assembly process? > > If GCC is adding flags that don't work with the assembler then it > suggests to me that the assembler is not the same one that was > present > when GCC was configured (GCC should know the right flags to use). > > Did someone install GCC, and then later change the binutils that is > installed? When you say "live with what is there", how did they get > there? Hi Jonathan, thank you for your interest. I gave a list of packages I needed to be installed to the admin of the system. These are the packages I need to build hpn-openssh and he installed them all from https://www.opencsw.org I think. Here is the List I gave him: Build dependencies: Package: coreutils (8.22,REV=2014.06.14) Package: autoconf (2.69,REV=2012.04.25) Package: gcc5core (5.2.0,REV=2015.07.31) Package: perl (5.10.1,REV=2012.07.24) Package: gmake (4.2.1,REV=2016.08.04) Package: gsed (4.2.2,p,REV=2012.12.26) Package: gpatch (2.7.1,REV=2013.10.01) Runtime and build dependencies: Package: libz1 (1.2.8,REV=2013.09.23) Package: libz_dev (1.2.8,REV=2013.09.23) Package: libssl1_0_0 (1.0.1t,REV=2016.05.03) Package: libssl_dev (1.0.1t,REV=2016.05.03) Package: libldns1 (1.6.17,REV=2014.04.06) Package: libldns_dev (1.6.17,REV=2014.04.06) Package: libedit0 (20130712_3.1,REV=2014.01.01) Package: libedit_dev (20130712_3.1,REV=2014.01.01) gcc came from the gcc5core package and the Assembler is in a package called binutils as a dependency for gcc. I hope this helps you to help me, Sascha
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
