---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bin.Cheng <amker.cheng@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:02 PM Subject: Help about how to bootstrap gcc with local version glibc other than system one To: "gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx> Hi, Recently I tried to bootstrap gcc against new glibc but failed. What I want to do is just bootstrap gcc against local version glibc other than system one, because I can't update glibc in that system. I tried this by configuring GCC using "--with-build-sysroot" or "--with-sysroot" or both, but all failed. When "--with-build-sysroot" is used, stage2 gcc failed when building internal binaries like genautomata, because it uses system version glibc and stage1 libstdc++. Apparently these two libraries are incompatible because stage1 libstdc++ is built against new glibc. When "--with-sysroot" is used, stage1 gcc failed when building libgcc, because it tried to find sysroot in build directory according to how sysroot is relocated in GCC. Apparently this doesn't exist because xgcc doesn't come from toolchain distribution. When "--with-sysroot" and "--with-build-sysroot" are used, stage2 GCC failed when configuring itself because some configuration check cannot find correct sysroot (standard headers like stdio.h). Seems to me Andrew was right in comment of PR69559, that we simply couldn't bootstrap GCC with sysroot. My question here is: If this is the case, how should I bootstrap a gcc against local version glibc, rather than the system one? Is chroot the only way to do that? Thanks, bin I realized this is actually a gcc-help question. Sorry for disturbing. Thanks, bin
