On 27 February 2015 at 20:45, dcoffin wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > Yes, I know that cam_xyz[] would have to be declared > differently for *(cam_xyz + (i)*3 + (j)) to work, but it's > all the same at the hardware level. If you're not going to follow the rules of the C language then maybe you should stop writing C and stick to assembler.
