Re: compiler warning about literal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Luchezar Belev wrote:

> note the following strange gcc behavior:
> 
>  "long long t = 268435456;" =>doesn't give warning
>  "long long t = 2684354560;" => gives warning!
>  "long long t = 26843545600;" => doesn't give warning!
> 
> it looks to me that there is something wrong here

I think thats correct

268435456 fit and was positive 
2684354560 is a negative long on the right side and was sign extended -> warning
26843545600 is a long long I guess and thus again positive -> no warning

thx!
hofrat




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux