Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:14:39 +0100
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAH6eHdTtokohy3w2QLxtq+psB-FL0ULPZV5dm_wQm5iYPwhMyw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4

> This command is invalid, the libraries should come after the files
> that refer to the symbols in the library.

Do you suggest a different ordering of the passed software libraries here?

Can the given source file "Video1.cpp" be specified as the last parameter on the
command line?

Regards,
Markus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  - From: Markus Elfring
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Prev by Date: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
Next by Date: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
Previous by thread: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
Next by thread: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]