Hi,
I have MinGW ports of gcc (3.4.5, 4.5.2, 4.6.3, 4.7.0) and, I have some code
where I get the warning that forms the subject line of this post.
It's essentially the same warning for all of those versions of gcc, and it
needs -Wall to trigger it.
My understanding of that warning is that it's telling me that argument 2
*is* NULL.
Is my understanding correct ?
I have some C code (perl API) and I'm getting that warning even though
argument 2 is not NULL ... and I just want to be sure that I'm understanding
the message correctly before I chase this up further (on a perl forum).
For anyone interested (and in case it might be of relevance), using -Wall, I
get the warning when I do:
if(strcmp("Math::BigInt", HvNAME(SvSTASH(SvRV(x))))) { .... }
yet, if I break that into 2 lines:
const char * h = HvNAME(SvSTASH(SvRV(x)));
if(strcmp("Math::BigInt", h)) { .... }
no such warning is emitted.
Also it is already established, prior to the strcmp call, that
HvNAME(SvSTASH(SvRV(x))) is non-NULL.
And, of course, if argument 2 really was NULL, then the strcmp call would
crash at runtime - which it doesn't do. (At least, whenever I *do* pass a
NULL to strcmp, the program crashes at that point during execution.)
Main thing for the moment is that I verify that I understand the warning
correctly.
(Additional advice/observations are welcome :-)
Cheers,
Rob
