> So after a pile of noises made I was ableto finally posts ome sort of > result : > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-11/msg01367.html > > Not exactly what I was hoping for but it seems to be a step in the right > direction. Notice that I gave up on the --disable-multilib option and did > embrace the --disable-nls which allowed stage 1 to complete. > > Not too sure what to make of all those failures with g++ or gcc for that > matter. Everything else was flawless. I think that the visibility failures are expected - because of the antiquated assembler. You need to use the GNU assembler if you want to have all the fancy C++ features, as well as other advanced features. The gnat.dg/lto14.adb failure is also expected (it's adjusted on the branch). The g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr28.C and libgomp.c/sort-1.c failures aren't expected. -- Eric Botcazou
