On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> What version of flex do you have installed? If you look at the file >>> gcc/gengtype-lex.c in your build directory, do you see typedefs for >>> flex_int32_t? >>> >> >> flex --version >> flex 2.5.35 >> >> grep int32 gengtype-lex.c >> flex_int32_t yy_verify; >> flex_int32_t yy_nxt; >> static yyconst flex_int32_t yy_ec[256] = >> static yyconst flex_int32_t yy_meta[63] = > > How odd. My flex (on Ubuntu) also reports itself as 2.5.35. But: > >> grep int32 gengtype-lex.c > typedef int32_t flex_int32_t; > typedef uint32_t flex_uint32_t; > typedef int flex_int32_t; > typedef unsigned int flex_uint32_t; > flex_int32_t yy_verify; > flex_int32_t yy_nxt; > static yyconst flex_int32_t yy_ec[256] = > static yyconst flex_int32_t yy_meta[63] = > > Why are you missing the typedefs? I have no suggestion. It seems like > it must be a bug in your version of flex. > It is. For the record: Cross Linux from scratch have a patch which fix this. http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/flex-2.5.35-gcc44-1.patch I had to compile and install flex myself to get past this. -- chs,
