On 2012-03-20, at 6:48 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Vaugha Brewchuk <vaugha_brewchuk@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I just had a good look at both static libraries that were generated during the build process, libstdc++ and libsupc++. I found that libstdc++ has in it all the objects from libsupc++ with the exception of eh_aux_runtime.o and eh_personality.o. This explains why I get linker warnings with missing symbols __gxx_personality_sj0 and __cxa_call_unexpected. Can you please confirm that these objects need to be statically linked into libstdc++? I can then figure out why they have been omitted. > > Yes, those objects should be in the static libstdc++.a archive. They > should also be in the static libsupc++.a archive. I don't know why they > would be missing for you. > > Ian This helps a lot, since now I know "why" and I just need to identify the "how". To help, I built gcc-3.2.3 with static libraries on a virtualized Ubuntu 4.10 and confirmed that the two objects are in both libraries. I will compare the build processes to determine why on NEXTSTEP eh_aux_runtime.o and eh_personality.o are in libsupc++ only and are missing in libstdc++. Thank you again!
