Re: AVX types: m256d versus v4sd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: AVX types: __m256d versus __v4sd
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:28:15 -0700
Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1203182010020.2543@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr> (Marc Glisse's message of "Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:29:30 +0100 (CET)")
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On the other hand, Intel only documents __m256d (the may_alias
> version), so portability says to use that one.

Yes.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AVX types: __m256d versus __v4sd
  - From: James Cloos

References:
- AVX types: __m256d versus __v4sd
  - From: Marc Glisse

Prev by Date: Re: documentation question
Next by Date: Re: How do I add missing stdc functions to libstdc++-v3?
Previous by thread: AVX types: __m256d versus __v4sd
Next by thread: Re: AVX types: __m256d versus __v4sd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux