On 25 November 2011 10:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25 November 2011 08:59, Erotavlas_turbo@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have read that the threading programming proposed in new C++ standard >> (C0x11) > > (It was informally called C++0x but is now published and often > referred to as C++11, but calling it C++0x11 makes no sense.) Sorry, I meant calling it C0x11 makes no sense (although C++0x11 doesn't either)
