On 25 November 2011 08:59, Erotavlas_turbo@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, > > I have read that the threading programming proposed in new C++ standard > (C0x11) (It was informally called C++0x but is now published and often referred to as C++11, but calling it C++0x11 makes no sense.) > is supported by GCC but only a small subset of features are available. > So for the moment is better to use the boost thread library (that should be the > same adopted by new standard, correct me if I'm wrong) or the complete support > by GCC is not so far? Since you suggest Boost as an alternative I assume you are only talking about the new library classes (since that's all Boost provides). The library features are almost complete: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.200x There is more work to be done for the core language features: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/ http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM
