Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> So it should be skipped and the ICE is the normal behavior for such >>> irrelevant test cases ? >> >> Personally, I don't really think an ICE is ever an acceptable result >> from the compiler. However, there are practical considerations. Nobody >> is ever going to write code like that for your processor. If gets an >> ICE, no real programmer is ever going to notice. And if it didn't get >> an ICE it would get an error instead. So it's really up to you how much >> effort you want to put in to generating a proper error message rather >> than an ICE. > > I agree. BTW, I wonder how I could handle such an ICE from my backend > if I wanted to. I don't know--I don't know exactly what is causing the ICE. Ian
