Re: gcc-help Digest 6 Sep 2011 07:10:15 -0000 Issue 3793

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just for Correction
Dear Andrew
Dead is typing mistake sorry Dear is correct

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:50 AM, esmaeil mirzaee
<esmaeil.debian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
> I apologize for weak English, and interrupt.
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 6 September 2011 08:25, Milind wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> I dont't know how to reply to a message on "gcc-help" mailing list so,
>>> I am directly writing to you.
>>
>> You just reply, including the list address in the To or CC fields.
>>
>>> WRT your question: I am trying to see if some of the performance
>>> related observations I am doing on GCC coming with SPEC-2006 is not
>>> invalidated by more recent GCC versions. So, want to run same
>>> workloads on newer GCC to check that the findings are still relevant.
> I test most of the branch of SPEC 2006 in GCC 4.5.2 without any
> problem. If you find a problem you can send it to me, If I can resolve
> I will happy and I will send it to you.
>
> Do you want run SPEC 2006 on Simplescalar?
>>> Could you help me on teh flags that will make current GCC behave like
>>> the one in SPEC-2006?
> The last SPEC 2006 can work on gcc-3.3.5 but you can use it with
> latest gcc like 4.4.5.
> And another suggestion is install gcc version 3.3.5(but I don't recommended)
>> It's still not clear what you mean by "behave like" ... GCC is still a
>> compiler so it still behaves similarly.
>>
>> There are many changes since 3.2, mostly good, and most cannot be disabled.
>>
>> Is there some specific behaviour you want to change?  Please be specific.
>>
>> If you can't be specific, maybe you don't actually need to change
>> anything?  Have you actually tried and found a problem?  If not, why
>> don't you do that, and then ask more specific questions if you have a
>> specific problem.
> Dead Andrew
> I think it's so difficult at this time as a senior student, say what I
> need. I'm new but I love to know How can I do it?
> If you can give me some suggestion I will appreciate it.
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:31:29 +0100
>>> Subject: Re: Want GCC 4.1.2 to run like SPEC 2006 GCC
>>> On 09/03/2011 01:02 PM, Milind wrote:
>>>> I want to run GCC 4.1.2 in a mode similar to GCC 3.2 present in SPEC
>>>> 2006 benchmarks:  http://www.spec.org/auto/cpu2006/Docs/403.gcc.html
>>>> I do not need 100% parity, but at least fairly similar. Pl can someone
>>>> share what all flags need be passed to GCC 4.1.2 to behave somewhat
>>>> like GCC 3.2 present in SPEC 2006 ?
>>>
>>> What is the problem that you are trying to solve?
>>>
>>> Andrew.
>>>
>>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux