Kevin Klues <klueska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > That said, do you see any obvious issues with my solution? It seems > to work for all of the test cases I've thrown at it, but I could be > missing something. Additionally, do you have any suggestions for a > better method that achieves similar results? Ideally I'd like a > solution that didn't require the use of the 'optimize' attribute as > (unfortunately) some of the systems on which we'd like to compile our > code still use gcc < 4.4. I don't see any obvious issues with your solution. I'm not sure why you need to use the optimize attribute; I would have expected that the noinline attribute would be sufficient here. Ian
