Re: -fdump-tree-original

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: kevin diggs <diggskevin38@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-original
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:25:07 -0700
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BANLkTinX-8_ftn-M-5zXLNn+Ki2LXSpE6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (kevin diggs's message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:10:55 -0500")
References: <BANLkTinX-8_ftn-M-5zXLNn+Ki2LXSpE6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

kevin diggs <diggskevin38@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Does anyone know the reason -fdump-tree-original does not work for C
> in the 3.4.6 compilogical era? Compiling the file as C++ (-xc++) seems
> to produce useful output.

As far as I can recall, it was invented for C++ in the first place.  It
was only supported for C with the introduction of tree-ssa in gcc 4.0.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -fdump-tree-original
  - From: kevin diggs

References:
- -fdump-tree-original
  - From: kevin diggs

Prev by Date: -fdump-tree-original
Next by Date: Re: "cannot run C compiled programs" error
Previous by thread: -fdump-tree-original
Next by thread: Re: -fdump-tree-original
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux