BTW, I find it unfortunate that PPL and ClooG cannot also be built
in this way. Is there some reason, or just priorities?
Priorities, in a sense. They are optional libraries, and the set of
people who use those libraries is disjoint from the set of people who
maintain the build system.
I think that ppl, if included in the source tree, is compiled and built
(not cloog though) - at least I think that was the case when I was
building my cross toolchain using gcc 4.5.2. Obviously the ppl-x.x.x
directory needs to be called just "ppl" for this to work. I do not know
whether that is the case with the new version.
MZ
