Matt Fago <fago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm trying to build gcc 4.6.0 on OpenSuSE 11.2 x86_64 with latest MPC, > MPFR, GMP built in-tree (vers 0.9, 3.0.1, 5.0.1). I've always used > in-tree builds in the past as they are the least troublesome. > > Configuring with: > > ../gcc-4.6.0/configure --prefix=/usr/local \ > --libdir=/usr/local/lib64 --program-suffix=-4.6 \ > --with-arch=corei7 --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-gold \ > --enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-linux-futex \ > --without-system-libunwind --with-ppl-lib=/usr/lib64 \ > --with-ppl-include=/usr/include --with-cloog-lib=/usr/lib64 \ > --with-cloog-include=/usr/include --enable-lto > > I get several errors such as: > > [...]/gcc/gcc-build-4.6.0/./mpc/src/.libs/libmpc.a(pow.o): In function mpc_pow_exact': > [...]/gcc/gcc-build-4.6.0/mpc/src/../../../gcc-4.6.0/mpc/src/pow.c:123: undefined reference to `mpfr_get_z_2exp' > > > Evidently this is caused by MPC picking up the older incompatible > system version of MPFR? Shouldn't this be taken care of by the > in-tree onfig somehow? Yes, it should. This sounds like a bug. > BTW, I find it unfortunate that PPL and ClooG cannot also be built > in this way. Is there some reason, or just priorities? Priorities, in a sense. They are optional libraries, and the set of people who use those libraries is disjoint from the set of people who maintain the build system. Ian
