OOps, please disregard the last email! Sorry for that, wrong mailing list, was writing to French speaking cycling ml!!! Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Fernandez > Sent: 21 March 2011 09:57 > To: 'gcc-help@xxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: function overloading on __restrict__ > > J'ai mal aux cuisses et aux fesses aujourd'hui. C'est comme si j'avais fait du > sport hier :)) > > Dr Eric Fernandez > Project Leader > Physiomics plc > The Magdalen Centre > The Oxford Science Park > Oxford > OX4 4GA > UK > Tel: +44 (0)1865 784986 > Web: http://www.physiomics-plc.com > Physiomics plc (Company # 4225086, VAT# GB 778 7496 48) is registered in > England and Wales at The Magdalen Centre, The Oxford Science Park, Robert > Robinson Avenue, Oxford OX4 4GA > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx] > > On Behalf Of Marc Glisse > > Sent: 18 March 2011 17:04 > > To: Matthias Kretz > > Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: function overloading on __restrict__ > > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Matthias Kretz wrote: > > > > > it seems overloading on __restrict__ is not possible. I.e. GCC > > > complains > > > about: > > > void foo(float *__restrict__ mem) const; void foo(float *mem) const; > > > > > > This, to me, seems to have a very valid use case. Also the AIX C++ > > > compiler docs ( > > > > > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/comphelp/v7v91/index.jsp?topi > > > > > > c=%2Fcom.ibm.vacpp7a.doc%2Flanguage%2Fref%2Fclrc03restrict_type_quali > > f > > > ier.htm) specify "The __restrict__ qualifier also affects parameter > > > type specifications for overloaded functions in the same way as a > > > cv-qualifier, thereby affecting the overload set." > > > > Please read this page more carefully. > > > > void foo(float *const mem) const; > > void foo(float *mem) const; > > fails. > > > > void foo(float *__restrict__* mem) const; void foo(float **mem) const; > > works. > > > > -- > > Marc Glisse
