Re: why this testcase compile failed for gcc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



zhang qingshan <steven.zhang54373@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> /* ------- test case -------------------*/
> void x();
> template <typename T>
> void foo(const T*);
>
> int main() {
>    foo(x);
> }
>
> GCC 4.5 complains:
>
> a.cpp: In function 'int main()':
> a.cpp:6: error: no matching function for call to 'foo(void (&)())'
>
> It seems that, const T * is resolved as void (&)());
>
> IMO, T --> void (), const T --> void (), const T * --> void (*)(), and
> it should be leagle.

You are confusing function pointers with pointers to data objects.  They
are not the same thing in C++.  That is, a function pointer is not a
special type of pointer.

Ian


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux