Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 31 January 2011 19:16, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> >> Using -std=c++0x will cause libstdc++ to build in C++0x mode, which last >> time I checked was not strictly ABI compatible with libstdc++ not built >> in C++0x mode. ÂSo if you link with a dynamic libstdc++.so, you may get >> in trouble in some complex scenarios. > > Do you remember the details? I thought we'd done a good job of not > breaking the ABI, and have avoided making some changes required by > C+0x because they change the ABI. I'd like to document the potential > problems if you can remember where the incompatibilities are. http://gcc.gnu.org/PR45093 Ian
