On 31 January 2011 19:16, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > Using -std=c++0x will cause libstdc++ to build in C++0x mode, which last > time I checked was not strictly ABI compatible with libstdc++ not built > in C++0x mode. So if you link with a dynamic libstdc++.so, you may get > in trouble in some complex scenarios. Do you remember the details? I thought we'd done a good job of not breaking the ABI, and have avoided making some changes required by C+0x because they change the ABI. I'd like to document the potential problems if you can remember where the incompatibilities are.
